While it
has become imperative that organizations be able to develop a more
inclusive work environment and attract a more diverse workforce
through various diversity recruiting tools and strategies, it is
equally essential for them and/or their recruiting teams as well to
be aware of some of the common pitfalls to avoid when diversity
recruiting that cause
them to fall behind their goals, competitors, and even lose market
share.
Following
are the top 5 mistakes to avoid as gathered from high-caliber HR
specialists/experts:
1.
Absence of an EEO Statement
Whether
targeting candidates from diverse backgrounds or not, it is important
that an EEO statement be included. Its absence could send a message
that perhaps the organization does not value diversity.
2.
Company photo
diversity
The
organization only considers the visible dimensions of diversity
primarily race, and gender. The company photo looks good but everyone
thinks the same. Differences that include sexual orientation,
geographic background, thinking and communication style, work
function, ability and disability, religion, and work style are not
valued and are even discouraged. This is a very narrow definition of
diversity and offers little or no value to the organization in terms
of new ideas, creativity and innovation.
3.
Diversity in Numbers
Demographics reflect the outside community but it is
only at the lower levels. (Production, and unskilled labor) There is
little or no diversity as you move up into management. Every year
they have good “numbers”, but the people are constantly changing.
Employees leave and get jobs where there is a value of diversity at
all levels and they are encouraged to move up in the ranks.
4.
Antiquated
approaches to diversity recruiting
Less than 10% of the firms that actually set diversity
goals ever reach them. The diversity tools and approaches that are
routinely used were developed in another century and are ineffective
at best. Most fail to apply any of the principles sales professionals
have learned about selling into micro populations over the past 15
years.
5.
Advertisements that may hold greater appeal to minorities who have
less education, and ads with the word “qualified”
Doing so could have these potential job applicants feeling that the
advertisement is stereotyping, which often leads to resentment at
being targeted with these advertisements. With the new power and
reach of the Internet, word can rapidly spread, and the organization
could be labeled as one that is racist. Moreover, using the word
“qualified” in ads suggests to the minority professionals that
the organization is targeting that they are thought to be generally
not qualified.
Sources
No comments:
Post a Comment