In
The
Sociology of Discrimination: Racial
Discrimination in Employment, Housing, Credit, and Consumer Markets,
(a
PubMed article)
published
by the NCBI,
which reviews relevant literature concerning discrimination,
specifically about racial discrimination in the 4 areas mentioned in
the title, and provides an overview of major findings of the numerous
studies of discrimination, it is mentioned that in the field of
employment, African
Americans are twice as likely to be unemployed as whites (Hispanics
are only marginally so), and the wages of both blacks and Hispanics
continue to lag well behind those of whites (author’s analysis of
Current Population Survey, 2006).
The
findings of those studies show racial disparities
in labor market outcomes are due more to factors that precede labor
market entry (e.g., skill acquisition) rather than discrimination
within the labor market.
The
article further notes that
the processes affecting
access to employment (e.g., the influence of first impressions, the
absence of more reliable information on prospective employees, and
minimal legal oversight) may be more subject to discriminatory
decision making than those affecting wages.
Bias
can also come into play when employers make decisions on who to hire.
Unconscious biases
may stem from any racial prejudices and racial stereotypes.
These attitudes (racial
prejudices) and beliefs (racial sterotypes) can lead to
discrimination.
According
to Wikipedia,
stereotypes,
prejudice, and discrimination are understood as related but different
concepts. Stereotypes are regarded as the most cognitive component
and often occurs without conscious awareness, whereas prejudice is
the affective component of stereotyping and discrimination is one of
the behavioral components of prejudicial reactions.
Biases are
cognitive in nature. They are notions we have of other people, but
which we often are unaware of.
There
are different
types of cognitive biases,
those
annoying glitches in our thinking that cause us to make questionable
decisions and reach erroneous conclusions.
Some
common cognitive biases are:
Confirmation
bias
-
the often unconscious act of referencing only those
perspectives that fuel our pre-existing views, while at the same time
ignoring or dismissing opinions — no matter how valid — that
threaten our world view;
Ingroup
bias - a manifestation of our innate tribalistic tendencies;
Gambler's
fallacy – so called because it is heavily based on our previous
experiences or events, and believing these will influence future
outcomes.
Bandwagon
effect –
or what can be called as groupthink.
As
implied by the above as well as the other types of cognitive bias,
they cause us to form irrational judgment and wrong decisions.
We do have our
biases, our so-called 'blind spot' and these hidden biases affect the
way we assess others, in positive and/or negative ways. Even among
the best of us who have good intentions fall prey to the urging of
favoring, rightly of wrongly, one individual or group over another.
Research
point to this fact. For example, in
one study
by researchers
from Carnegie Mellon University, the City University London, Boston
University and the University of Colorado, Boulder, (published
in Management
Science), the
most striking finding was: everyone
is affected by blind spot bias — only one adult out of 661 said
that he/she is more biased than the average person. However, they did
find that the participants varied in the degree in which they thought
they were less biased than others. This was true irrespective of
whether they were actually unbiased or biased in their
decision-making.
More
often, being having one-sided opinion or being partial cause us to
see the good in others different from us in terms of perspective and
working style, among
other differences, so
we miss golden opportunties to engage with these people, or to live
or work
with them in
peace and harmony.
Yes, that is what happens when biases get the better of us.
Yes, that is what happens when biases get the better of us.
Negative biases we
form about others act like walls, deterring us from seeing the good
in others, and can reinforce our sense of superiority over others.
Likewise our positive biases – those that we nurture in favor of
those who belong in our groups or are similar to us, and share our
pre-conceived ideas and opinions – may blind us to their faults
(unjust criticisms/treatment of others) – so we unwittingly come to
tolerate such unfair acts.
Thus, it is
especially critical for employers, hiring managers, top decision
makers, to be able to identify their own blind spots in order to
overcome them. Blind spots may cloud their judgment and affect their
decisions regarding job applicants as well as employees being groomed
for promotion.
According
to the book, Blind
Spots: Why We Fail to Do What's Right and What to Do about It,
by Max H. Bazerman, a professor at Harvard Business School, and Ann
E. Tenbrunsel, a professor of business ethics at the University of
Notre Dame, there
is a gap between intended and actual behavior.
The
rapidly developing field of behavioral ethics has described a
decision-making process whereby we recognize what we should
do—give equal weight to job candidates of all races, for
example—but in the end do what we want
to do—hire just white candidates. - See
more here:
As such, biases can
undermine diversity efforts and minorities such as African Americans will continue to be marginalized or worse, be subject
to racial harrasment or violence. Women will continue to face
obstacles as they climb the corporate ladder and break the proverbial
glass ceiling.
As this article on
unconscious biases lists among the consequences
and costs of unconscious bias:
members
of minority groups or
groups who are quite different to the make-up
of
senior executives, and who have high capability
and potential,
may be missed by the usual
talent identification programme because
they
are different. This may lead to high turnover of
capable
individuals who are unable to progress
and therefore leave to seek
opportunities
elsewhere.
How to identify
hidden/unconscious biases?
Fortunately,
unconscious
bias can now be measured,
helping individuals see their
possible biases as an important step in understanding the roots of
stereotypes and prejudice in our society.
Managers
and executives, even employees, can benefit from taking the Reiss
Motivation Profile® (RMP),
a
standardized, comprehensive assessment of a person's needs,
interests, motives, and life goals. It
will help them identify their blind spots.
How
to manage or overcome hidden/unconscious biases? In other words, how
to not
let blind spots influence decisions in areas of recruitment, hiring,
performance
evaluation,
promotion/retention of personnel.
Managers
can follow the way of some companies, that is to strip
resumes of names and other identifying information and assigning
numbers, according to the article,
“How
corporate America is tackling unconscious bias.” Another
is to not
hire in one's image. - See
here
This
article
also shares ways to overcome hidden biases, among which is to
recognize that as human beings, our brains make
mistakes without us even knowing it. Without
accepting this fact, it will be difficult to change our perception of people,
running the risk of discriminating against others.
But
a pro-active approach to biases will help ensure diversity working in
the workplace and in the society.
No comments:
Post a Comment